PDA

View Full Version : A great thing about Lopez...

barringer97
06-12-2004, 02:00 AM
Did you notice right when we won..he ran on the field and told everyone to settle down, basically saying that we haven't done $hit.

Lopez is a stud. Go Cats!!!

Bear Down.
WilmasPimp
06-12-2004, 02:05 AM
Lopez is a freaking PIMP.
Chris Bonney
06-12-2004, 02:08 AM
Damn Straight. Jeremy Foley's Folley is truly helping the UA now. Greger had that one right all the way.

Straight PIMP=Andy Lopez.
WilmasPimp
06-12-2004, 02:11 AM
No way we lose to Seton Hall if Andy Lopez was the basketball coach.

No freaking way.
barringer97
06-12-2004, 02:13 AM
Originally posted by WilmasPimp
No way we lose to Seton Hall if Andy Lopez was the basketball coach.

No freaking way.

Classic!

I just hope he doesn't go to UCLA next year...
Chris Bonney
06-12-2004, 02:14 AM
Classic JJ, and he aint goin nowhere after this season, even if we lose two straight, which we aint gonna do.
Josh Gershon
06-12-2004, 02:18 AM
There's a clause in his contract that says he can't go to another Pac-10 school.
Auercat
06-12-2004, 09:42 AM
I was about to post that about Andy's contract. Besides, why would he want to go to UCLA and take a pay cut (he would have to as UCLA notoriously underpays its coaches)?

Bearing Down on Lopez Finding A Permanent Home In Tucson

Auercat
TakiCat
06-13-2004, 11:15 PM
Originally posted by WilmasPimp
No way we lose to Seton Hall if Andy Lopez was the basketball coach.

No freaking way.

No way we lose to Seton Hall if I was the freakin coach!!!

That team was absolutely TERRIBLE!!!

Anyways, GO BATCATS!!!
LegallyKenny
06-15-2004, 07:37 PM
Originally posted by AZCAT07
There's a clause in his contract that says he can't go to another Pac-10 school.

You can always break a contract if someone (UCLA most likely) is willing to pay the damages. In a case like this I would assume there are liquidated damage (a "buyout") becuse it would be almost impossible for Arizona to prove any specific damages from losing a coach. Courts are also loath to issue negative injunctions because of the free-market ethos that one should be able to sell their labor to anyone they want to if they're willing to pay off their original employer (the infamous "efficient breach").
ByJoveByJingle
06-15-2004, 07:42 PM
market rates for quality coaches, then why would they be willing to pay for a buyout?