Ban the Arizona Anti-Christ

[Quencher]

WassamatterU constantly assumes the role of Wildcat Saint, yet continually attacks the true Arizona fans with petty, irrelavent and childish posts.

It was suggested earlier that a vote might be taken among posters when we wanted to ban someone

If you're new - WassamatterU has an agenda to attack anyone and everyone that posts on an Arizona board. Many of us left the other board because of his presence there and constant beratement of anyone and everyone for absolutely no consistent reasons.

Please join me in voting this guy off the good board, if in fact that is our proceedure. I can promise only one thing. If he's allowed to stay - you will remember this post and you will regret it every time he posts

[katmandu]

I would rather have someone banned who consistently berates a certain player.

[Auercat]

Some others might try and give you a taste of your own medicine yu're proposing here. Call for banishment when warranted, not as an agenda. Otherwise the tables might be turned the other way. Just a little piece of friendly advice from a board mod. ;)

Bearing Down on No Protracted Poster Wars Here

Auercat

[Quencher]

WMU fails to conform to even the broadest definition of respect for fellow board memebers and ruins the commnity. We know that flammers like supersport and Slickwill will come and go and we can fun with them for a while, but the poisonous attacks to all comers from WMU are unacceptable.

Never once have I berated a player in a disrespectful manner, questioned their motives or integrety, desire, loyalty..... WMU does this all day long on the other board to nearly everyone.

[Cobaltrogue]

I think all of the moderators have it that they are going to be pretty open minded about what can and can not be posted here. As far as I'm concerned, as long as there is some modicum of respect and civility going on, there's no reason to even look into it. WMU has not done anything to warrant putting him into consideration on this board, so, I'm fine with him. I realize that you two have a past history of going at each other. I'm okay with that (to a point) too. As long as it doesn't turn into all out war and begin to affect this board as a whole. In the same breath, agitating it will not win any brownie points either. Just keep it real and enjoy the board as a great forum in which to express your opinions on the 'Cats.

Bear Down,
Cobaltrogue

[mines_bigger]

Hey 1990, here is an even older banning post still open.

[Schnebly]

I may be oblivious, but he's never seemed like a problem to me.

Schneb

[Class of 1990]

Hey 1990, here is an even older banning post still open.

CoolCat must be disappointed he wasn't the first. :)

Anyway I have voted for two people to be banned here ever.

Enfuego on his last banning attempt by Auercat. He could have apologized for the picture he posted and that would have been fine by me.

Bonney when he put himself up as a joke. I voted as a joke to ban him and the funny thing he should have been banned.

Lesson: Banning threads are not jokes.

[UofAcat23]

Enfuego on his last banning attempt by Auercat. He could have apologized for the picture he posted and that would have been fine by me.


I didn't see the thread which got enfuego immediatly banned (inappropriate pictures i think) but both he and cdlocked both made more valid points and could hold a reasonably intelligent discussion much better than WMU. I voted to keep them.

I don't think WMU should be banned either, but when you are put up to a banishment poll multiple times, it is time to take notice and stop behaving in such a childish manner.