USC game predictions

[gil=theonetruth]

Let's get this thread going...

I say we finally unleash the beast for a good 60 point W
UA - 74
USC - 14

[AZCat Man]

Pete Carol is a class guy. He won't run up the score intentionally. Besides, he can play his second and third stringers the entire second half to rest the some of the beat up starters.

USC 55
UA 6

[Jason Scheer]

Fumblerooski there, Flea Flicker here..Arizona comes into the Coliseum in an offensive blaze...

USC 59
Arizona 7

Yea that's right..Arizona scores a touchdown

[phenom5]

my prediction, the SC defense, only rushing 2 Dlinemen manages to record 8 sacks...

Univ of Spoiled Children-60
UA-3

[ByJoveByJingle]

I honestly won't be shocked if we score two touchdowns and a fieldgoal. SC will score somewhere between 40 and 400.

[Itamicbomb]

USC - 63
Arizona - 2

USC attempts a punt on its last possession but Tom Malone forgets where to line up for a safety out of the back of the endzone.

[jackets5]

USC- 63
Arizona-10

our points come in garbage time agianst SC's walk ons. Its gonna get ugly, at least it can only get better after this one

[VenturaCat]

With the past 2 slow starts for SC, they will probably come out with a purpose. They could hang 50 on us in the first half.

SC 60
UA 14

[catgrad]

Remember, USC struggled to beat Stanford last year. They're due for a "downer" after two straight tough road games. Covering the spread will be a challenge.

UA 10
USC 45

[scumdevils86]

hmmm..predicting the usc game is always amusing.
considering our offensive woes, constant miscues, and general stupidity when it comes to taking advantage of things like 85 yd punt returns, ints, and fumble recoveries...hmmm

USC 49
UA 9 (3 folk field goals)

same score as last year, no?

[bhanson]

Even USC third stringers can push away our first team D line, so even not running up the score it will be hard for them not to get 5-7 yards a pop.

SC 63-6, two Folk FGs as UA continues its red zone woes.

[alieberman]

68-3

[gil=theonetruth]

Since everyone's breaking down their predicted scoring

UA
20 Folk FGs
1 Baugher pass TD on a fake FG
1 Baugher rush TD on a fake punt

SC
2 Bush TDs

[TucsonDon]

Pete Carol is a class guy. He won't run up the score intentionally.
This is inaccurate, I believe. If you've watched USC over the past couple of years you have seen fake punts up four TD's in the 4th quarter, calling deep pass plays late in the 4th of a three TD game to get Leinart some better stats, and numerous instances of leaving starters in way too long, and running up the score on teams...He most definitely is not a class guy, and in fact he is known as the opposite in regards to this particular issue. Having said that, he has not run up the score against Arizona the past few years, and I suspect there is going to be a bit of a letdown this week for 'SC (as there honestly usually is when they are playing a poor team) in between ASU and Notre Dame.

USC 51
Arizona 10

[barringer97]

I think Usc will take it easy on us. Carrol should be careful about running it up on Pac 10 teams not named Ucla.

USC 45
Arizona 10

[the real dill]

Fumblerooski there, Flea Flicker here..Arizona comes into the Coliseum in an offensive blaze...

USC 59
Arizona 7

Yea that's right..Arizona scores a touchdown

Why is Damon wearing a stros cap in your sig? What/Why/Where did that come from?

[Chicat]

41-17

Next year we make it competitive . . .

[Ben Hansen]

66-5 SC

Yes, 5. ... because Arizona football allows crazy things to happen.

[SCCat]

U of A-6
# of Beers for SCCat at the game-0 :(

So the U of A wins 6-0.

Who are these USC guys everyone is talking about? :smokin:

[Jason Scheer]

Why is Damon wearing a stros cap in your sig? What/Why/Where did that come from?

I'm mocking the fact that every "expert" thinks the Stros are going to win. Damon grabbed a hat in the celebration and I guess the equipment guy messed up and he was wearing a Stros hat. He didn't even know until after.

[DCCat]

USC 56, UA 10

We do fairly well in the first half until Carroll informs his team that the game has begun.

[catgrad97]

OK, I'll take the wacko pick this week. Arizona is going to hang a few more points on the board than expected.

USC 49
UA 36

[Class of 1990]

Sc 56
Az 20

[Bison79]

Arizona doesn't even show up :)

If we thought the Cali RAP was going to be bad, at least we had our defense to save our asses in that game, in RAP, in this game...I don't think ANY player cracks 100 points...

[ArzCatz3]

84-0 USC. We'll still be winless...

[ByJoveByJingle]

Ya think? :rolleyes:

[igloo]

The Cats will keep it close,,,during warm-ups, gawd help us after that!

Cats: 10

Condoms: 69

[Josh Gershon]

OK, I'll take the wacko pick this week. Arizona is going to hang a few more points on the board than expected.

USC 49
UA 36

Arizona won't score 36 points in any game this year... and definitely not against US freaking C. Divide your predicted total by 12 and that's much more likely. :)

I'm going with:

USC 45
Arizona 3

[WildcatPaulG]

UA
20 Folk FGs
1 Baugher pass TD on a fake FG
1 Baugher rush TD on a fake punt


:rolleyes:

USC 42, Arizona 10

[coeagle]

52-14, USC rolls.. I think the cats will score, but SC will just destroy our defense. Also, I will be drunk enough to still enjoy the entire game! :)

[Phylek]

I think it's safe to say that regardless of the outcome we will hurt USC's SOS. That's right we do our damage in the BCS. We are truly the most feared team in the PAC-10.

[illcat]

Hey do the condoms still have that dude dressed up like something out of Gladiator, riding that horse up and down the sidelines??
If so maybe win can get a point or two if someone would lay him out.

[coeagle]

I think it's safe to say that regardless of the outcome we will hurt USC's SOS. That's right we do our damage in the BCS. We are truly the most feared team in the PAC-10.

From now on we scare everyone!

[UofAcat23]

Quarter 1: 14-3
Quarter 2: 7-0
Quarter 3: 21-3
Quarter 4: 10-0

52-6 USC

[coeagle]

Quarter 1: 14-3
Quarter 2: 7-0
Quarter 3: 21-3
Quarter 4: 10-0

52-6 USC

No way man, 6 points is totally locked in the 3rd!

[ZONACAT]

USC 66
Arizona 7

[Auercat]

Arizona 3
USC 73

Bearing Down on The Drinking Starting on Thursday Night ;)

Auercat

[Itamicbomb]

Just remember - no alcohol in the Coliseum.

[Auercat]

Just remember - no alcohol in the Coliseum.

But plenty on campus before the game. :smokin:

Bearing Down on Getting Tanked Before The Game, Not During ;)

Auercat

[Itamicbomb]

Or you could follow the Duke route - get tanked before the game, stay at the tailgate until the cops chase you out, then don't show up inside the stadium to see your team get rolled.

[SunDevilDon]

USC 56
UofA 9

[watcher79]

I guess sarcasim is theraputic!!!!!!! and I thought reading the message board could help get through the tough times...who was I kidding....I am sure none of you ever played college football...which make all of you experts a bunch of a holes.......sure USC will win...but walk in theirs shoes boys, walk in their shoes

[Jason Scheer]

I don't know what that means..and I'm a size 12 so I think I would be able to walk in some..

[watcher79]

probably not...size 12 would be smushed!!! on contact...

[Jason Scheer]

Oh Please..Keith Rivers can't touch me..

[desertdave]

Arizona 34, USC 31.

My Magic 8 Ball and Ouija Board can't be wrong.

Reaching to the Spirits Dave

[BlueWaterCat]

This is intolerable. Let me sugarcoat this very delicately for those with tender sensibilities:

I see NO #@$%ing POINT WHATSOEVER in picking against our team. It is unseemly at best. If we lose, I would take no pride or satisfaction in predicting our loss. WHAT ARE YOU #@%#ing AFRAID OF???

I choose instead to phrase things just a tad more positively - to wit, "For Arizona to win the USC game, and by so doing to pull off one of the greatest upsets since David had good aim, the score of Saturday's game would have to resemble something similar to Arizona 33, USC 31 - in double overtime".

Consider the circumstances for such a score to occur! It is a much more pleasant exercise than taking the position of the masses (and the spread). Sure, USC is favored, and for very clear reasons. So what - an Arizona win *would* be an upset of epic proportion.

Ya know what, folks? We ain't lost yet, and I see absolutely no point in predicting a loss - especially on, of all places, the premiere UA fan site in the world. The LAST fooking thing I want to hear in the Coliseum is, "Yeah, even the diehard UA fans were picking against their team." - where I'm from, that is just pathetic.

To quote 'Eurotrip' in relative context, "For shaaaaaame..." I'll tell you what you win by picking against Arizona - a trip to Club VanderSexxx, that's what ... and no safe word for you.

BWC

[asuhater]

I agree! I will never pick against UA....Cats 30 Rubbers 29. And no matter what anyone says about how much better this SC team is or how much better that UA team was.....Dont forget October 11 1981 as the headline reads... Cats shock #1 USC 13-10.....Miracles can happen. Even unthinkable ones. And they can happen at the strangest of times. I still believe we will win every game. Always have, always will. Call me loony but thats how I am. GO CATS!!! BEAT THE RUBBERS!!!

[losgatosaz05]

SC 56
Cats 10

[Itamicbomb]

SC 56
Cats 10

Thank you for restoring sanity to the thread.

We all want the Cats to win, we're just comfortable with the notion that there is not a very good chance that they will win (which also isn't the same with being comfortable with losing - it's just being realistic). Calm down.

[tstein7240]

My prediction..

By the 2nd quarter, my wife (who I am dragging to the game with me on our vacation) will be tugging at my shirt asking to leave. Questioning why we should stay at the game as Arizona is getting stomped.

By the 3rd quarter, she will be making jokes about my alma mater... while I, in return, slam the small Division II school she went to.

By the 4th quarter, the remaining Arizona fans will be chatting TUI, TUI, TUI, TUI

[Mustache Man]

USC 42
Arizona 24

Arizona's touchdowns are scored on a defensive fumble recovery, a Steptoe punt return, and a Gilbert Harris rushing TD on a short field. Kovalchek throws 5 picks.

[Auercat]

This is intolerable. Let me sugarcoat this very delicately for those with tender sensibilities:

I see NO #@$%ing POINT WHATSOEVER in picking against our team. It is unseemly at best. If we lose, I would take no pride or satisfaction in predicting our loss. WHAT ARE YOU #@%#ing AFRAID OF???

I choose instead to phrase things just a tad more positively - to wit, "For Arizona to win the USC game, and by so doing to pull off one of the greatest upsets since David had good aim, the score of Saturday's game would have to resemble something similar to Arizona 33, USC 31 - in double overtime".

Consider the circumstances for such a score to occur! It is a much more pleasant exercise than taking the position of the masses (and the spread). Sure, USC is favored, and for very clear reasons. So what - an Arizona win *would* be an upset of epic proportion.

Ya know what, folks? We ain't lost yet, and I see absolutely no point in predicting a loss - especially on, of all places, the premiere UA fan site in the world. The LAST fooking thing I want to hear in the Coliseum is, "Yeah, even the diehard UA fans were picking against their team." - where I'm from, that is just pathetic.

To quote 'Eurotrip' in relative context, "For shaaaaaame..." I'll tell you what you win by picking against Arizona - a trip to Club VanderSexxx, that's what ... and no safe word for you.

BWC

Predicting an Arizona loss to USC does not make one any less of a fan. you know what it makes them-

Coherent :)

Seriously man, I'll be one of the few thousand in blue or red cheering for the Cats and won't be happy to see my team get rolled (which they will be, so stop pretending the won't) just like I was last year. It's one thing to be optimistic, it's another to be delusional. Even the best of fans know that sometimes the team they bleed for is not going to win. And no matter how much I want the Cats to win, I know it's not going to happen this week. So why should I make a silly prediction and go into a road game and brag how the UA is going to beat the #1 team in the country when it ain't gonna happen??? :confused:

Bearing Down on Some People Not Being Able To Handle The Truth :rolleyes:

Auercat

PS You just called some of the very best diehards here out as not being UA fans because they picked USC this week. That's some seriously weak sh@t man. :angry:

[OCCAT]

10:30am crack first beer as we fire up the grill next to the Sports Arena.

11:00am need a neck brace from checking all the MILTF's out walking by our tailgate.

11:30am feeling no pain.............

12:00 leave our tailgate out of my freaking mind and talking sh!t to any toejam that tries to vibe me on our way to the gate.

12:20pm purchase a nice cold coke.

12:30pm stumble into my seat and start immediately making friends as they mock my UofA baseball hat. Same Sh!t every year with these old farts and I had a blast with them last season when our boys gave them a scare for 3 quarters!

12:35pm Crack the bottle of Jack pour into coke and watch the biggest upset in the history of college football unfold........

5pm Getting arrested after storming the field in double OT after Folk booms a 52 yard strike right down the f@cking middle for the win!

Cats 31 toejams 28

[gil=theonetruth]

10:30am crack first beer as we fire up the grill next to the Sports Arena.

11:00am need a neck brace from checking all the MILTF's out walking by our tailgate.

11:30am feeling no pain.............

12:00 leave our tailgate out of my freaking mind and talking sh!t to any toejam that tries to vibe me on our way to the gate.

12:20pm purchase a nice cold coke.

12:30pm stumble into my seat and start immediately making friends as they mock my UofA baseball hat. Same Sh!t every year with these old farts and I had a blast with them last season when our boys gave them a scare for 3 quarters!

12:35pm Crack the bottle of Jack pour into coke and watch the biggest upset in the history of college football unfold........

5pm Getting arrested after storming the field in double OT after Folk booms a 52 yard strike right down the f@cking middle for the win!

Cats 31 toejams 28


A ****ing men

[losgatosaz05]

Predicting an Arizona loss to USC does not make one any less of a fan. you know what it makes them-

Coherent :)

Seriously man, I'll be one of the few thousand in blue or red cheering for the Cats and won't be happy to see my team get rolled (which they will be, so stop pretending the won't) just like I was last year. It's one thing to be optimistic, it's another to be delusional. Even the best of fans know that sometimes the team they bleed for is not going to win. And no matter how much I want the Cats to win, I know it's not going to happen this week. So why should I make a silly prediction and go into a road game and brag how the UA is going to beat the #1 team in the country when it ain't gonna happen??? :confused:

Bearing Down on Some People Not Being Able To Handle The Truth :rolleyes:

Auercat

PS You just called some of the very best diehards here out as not being UA fans because they picked USC this week. That's some seriously weak sh@t man. :angry:

Tried to give ya rep for this...you know the drill...Good post though!!

[SoFlaCat]

I have to wonder if Coach Stoops or his assistants ever read the stuff on these boards. Surely, there is someone within the athletic department who reads these - how else could they "take the temperature" on public sentiment?

I would like to go on record with this. When Stoops was hired, we KNEW the suffering would continue for a while. We knew it was going to get worse before it got better. One year to recruit, one more for redshirting said recruits. All the while still trying to make due with substandard talent. It is rational to expect more losses and lots of them.

The biggest area of concern for THIS fan is: WHy has this coaching staff not been able to teach 22 starters how NOT to commit idiotic penalties? Offsides. Illegal procedure. Delay of game. Too many guys on the field. Forget this, forget that. Illegal formation.

What the f*ck is going on that this collection of coaches, touted as they are, coming from the University of "By God" Oklahoma - CANNOT SEEM TO TEACH fundamentals? Granted, we're not talking rocket scientists. But we're not talking Rocket SCIENCE either, for Christ's sake.

This concerns me very much.

[desertdave]

10:30am crack first beer as we fire up the grill next to the Sports Arena.

........




Absolutely beautiful, OCCAT! :D

[ByJoveByJingle]

I have to wonder if Coach Stoops or his assistants ever read the stuff on these boards. Surely, there is someone within the athletic department who reads these - how else could they "take the temperature" on public sentiment?

I would like to go on record with this. When Stoops was hired, we KNEW the suffering would continue for a while. We knew it was going to get worse before it got better. One year to recruit, one more for redshirting said recruits. All the while still trying to make due with substandard talent. It is rational to expect more losses and lots of them.

The biggest area of concern for THIS fan is: WHy has this coaching staff not been able to teach 22 starters how NOT to commit idiotic penalties? Offsides. Illegal procedure. Delay of game. Too many guys on the field. Forget this, forget that. Illegal formation.

What the f*ck is going on that this collection of coaches, touted as they are, coming from the University of "By God" Oklahoma - CANNOT SEEM TO TEACH fundamentals? Granted, we're not talking rocket scientists. But we're not talking Rocket SCIENCE either, for Christ's sake.

This concerns me very much.

You are the archetypal whiny, self-indulgent *****y fan I was referring to earlier. :cool:

[BlueWaterCat]

Bearing Down on Some People Not Being Able To Handle The Truth

Auercat

PS You just called some of the very best diehards here out as not being UA fans because they picked USC this week. That's some seriously weak sh@t man.


*LOL* As usual, your spin has outpaced anything that resembles logic. I wonder if you even realize what you type sometimes. Here it is again, slowly:

1) Not picking against your team does not equal bragging that they'll win.

2) Predicting a score not in favor of your team *does* equal picking against your team. Picking against your team is weak. Period. If there were 100 fans in a room, and 50 picked against Arizona, and 50 didn't - I'd call the 50 who didn't the better fans.

3) Don't put words in my mouth, junior. Save the spin for your friends at the Fox News Channel.

While you're at it, *please* stop cheapening the memory of Button Salmon. I'm sure you can come up with something original if you try really hard, even if you are a resident of the Valley :).

Have a nice day/week/month,

BWC

[WildcatPaulG]

Don't put words in my mouth, junior. Save the spin for your friends at the Fox News Channel.

Auer, you work at Fox News? Hook a brotha up with a job, mang.

[ByJoveByJingle]

*LOL* As usual, your spin has outpaced anything that resembles logic. I wonder if you even realize what you type sometimes. Here it is again, slowly:

1) Not picking against your team does not equal bragging that they'll win.

2) Predicting a score not in favor of your team *does* equal picking against your team. Picking against your team is weak. Period. If there were 100 fans in a room, and 50 picked against Arizona, and 50 didn't - I'd call the 50 who didn't the better fans.

3) Don't put words in my mouth, junior. Save the spin for your friends at the Fox News Channel.

While you're at it, *please* stop cheapening the memory of Button Salmon. I'm sure you can come up with something original if you try really hard, even if you are a resident of the Valley :).

Have a nice day/week/month,

BWC

So everybody has to plead the 5th when we are playing the 2-time National Champions?

Weird.

[Auercat]

*LOL* As usual, your spin has outpaced anything that resembles logic. I wonder if you even realize what you type sometimes. Here it is again, slowly:

1) Not picking against your team does not equal bragging that they'll win.

2) Predicting a score not in favor of your team *does* equal picking against your team. Picking against your team is weak. Period. If there were 100 fans in a room, and 50 picked against Arizona, and 50 didn't - I'd call the 50 who didn't the better fans.

3) Don't put words in my mouth, junior. Save the spin for your friends at the Fox News Channel.

While you're at it, *please* stop cheapening the memory of Button Salmon. I'm sure you can come up with something original if you try really hard, even if you are a resident of the Valley :).

Have a nice day/week/month,

BWC

BWC,

I know that I'm wasting my time with this, but nevertheless I'll address you point by point and in slow motion so that you don't get lost. :devil:

1. If you're not picking against your team, then why don't you just say you're picking them? Instead you are chosing to use a double negative to hedge your bets in making an atrocious prediction this week, By saying that you pick the Cats to win, you are propping them up this week. There is no way to spin this. And if you don't believe you're bragging and that you're making a solid college football prediction, then there's no saving you.

2. Picking your team to win every game (especially when your team is playing as poorly as the Cats are) is sophomoric and myopic. Picking your team who has won 3 Division 1 games in 2+ seasons to beat the 2 time defending National Champs and #1 Team in The Country on the road is well, there are no words to describe doing that. And there you go again with calling people with an outrageously biased view better fans. In fact, quite the opposite can be argued to you calling people picking the Cats better fans,since doing so implies that you probably have not watched one down of college football or a UA game this season. Real fans and good fans live in the real world. That being said, I know there are great fans on both sides of these predictions. Some of us chose to be realistic, while other chose to live in Fantasyland. Don't worry BWC, everything will be alright. :wink2:

3. Everything I said in my reply is taken or inferred from what you wrote in yours. If I incorrectly assumed anything, then please show me where. And as for Fox News Channel, boy, I sure do hope I get to become friends with some of the Female News Anchors there. ;)

4. It's not cheapening the memory of anyone to live in the reality rather than a make believe place. Anyone who picks the Cats this week seriously needs to seek medical help as he/she is either delusional or has suffered a blow to the brain. Being optimistic and cheering on the Cats is fun. Picking the Cats to win this week and then berating and criticizing those of us who do not is just plain weird.

5. The last time I checked I don't live in the Valley. So in addition to you picking up a newspaper and finding out what's really happened in college football for the last 3 years or so, you also want to check out a Thomas Guide so you don't get lost on your weak attempt to talk geographical smack. :)

Bearing Down on Not Imagining That "Super Fan" BlueWaterCat Has Spent Half of The Time, Energy and Money Following The Cats That Many of Us Predicting A Loss This Week Have :rolleyes:

Auercat

[gil=theonetruth]

4. It's not cheapening the memory of anyone to live in the reality rather than a make believe place. Anyone who picks the Cats this week seriously needs to seek medical help as he/she is either delusional or has suffered a blow to the brain. Being optimistic and cheering on the Cats is fun. Picking the Cats to win this week and then berating and criticizing those of us who do not is just plain weird.




I think he was talking about how old and cliche the Bearing down on bla bla bla thing is. That's what he meant by cheapening the memory of John Button Salmon.

[WildcatPaulG]

myopic

Did you get permission from TucsonDon to use that word?

[aicrag]

Doesn't do me any good to predict a U$C rout so instead I will go oppo (as Mike Greenberg would say).

Lubricated or Unlubricated 31
Upset of the Century (Cats) 32

[BlueWaterCat]

My reply to Auercat [sic] negative rep was the following: "that's the best you can do? predictable negative rep and a weak, rambling attempt at a response? we're sitting here laughing at you. seriously - consider internet addiction therapy - soon."

Funny stuff all the way around.

In the end, there are fans, and then there are fans who remember and understand what the word 'fan' is short for - *fanatic*. I never picked against the Red Sox, the Celtics, or the Bills - add up *those* losing seasons, eh? *twitch* And naturally, I hate (not despise, not dislike intensely, not have issues with, but *hate*) the Yankmees and the Lakers to this day (sorry, Newport Cat :)).

I wonder how many "diehard fans", with whom our beloved moderator claims to identify and for whom he has become the self-appointed spokesman, have put money on the other team to win versus Arizona? Where does it end?

Sure, on paper, if you handicap the USC game it looks like a 40-point blowout or worse. That is neither in dispute, nor is it the point.

Diehard fans do *not* pick against their own teams. Ever.

BWC

PS: Thanks for the PMs and the positive rep to offset [sic]'s tantrum - I don't quite understand how that all works but appreciate the gestures nonetheless.

[xethw]

UofA 27, USC 24. BCS administrators leap to their deaths by the dozen.

[Auercat]

My reply to Auercat [sic] negative rep was the following: "that's the best you can do? predictable negative rep and a weak, rambling attempt at a response? we're sitting here laughing at you. seriously - consider internet addiction therapy - soon."

Funny stuff all the way around.

In the end, there are fans, and then there are fans who remember and understand what the word 'fan' is short for - *fanatic*. I never picked against the Red Sox, the Celtics, or the Bills - add up *those* losing seasons, eh? *twitch* And naturally, I hate (not despise, not dislike intensely, not have issues with, but *hate*) the Yankmees and the Lakers to this day (sorry, Newport Cat :)).

I wonder how many "diehard fans", with whom our beloved moderator claims to identify and for whom he has become the self-appointed spokesman, have put money on the other team to win versus Arizona? Where does it end?

Sure, on paper, if you handicap the USC game it looks like a 40-point blowout or worse. That is neither in dispute, nor is it the point.

Diehard fans do *not* pick against their own teams. Ever.

BWC

PS: Thanks for the PMs and the positive rep to offset [sic]'s tantrum - I don't quite understand how that all works but appreciate the gestures nonetheless.

BWC,

Where did I say I put my money on, errr bet against the Cats? :confused: :fur: Never have and never well. I simply like many of the good fans here made a prediction that the UA was going to lose this one game and then proceeded to get called a fair weather fan by you. In addition my "tantrum" was only a response on your diatribe (we can forward a dictionary to you on that if you like :) ) on who is and is not a fan.

And I'll stand by what I said- You can love your team as much if not more than the next guy, even if you believe your team is not going to win every game. Calling those of us who pick the Cats to lose this game non-fans is laugable. Now I'm off to the game. Are you going BWC? :devil:

Bearing Down on Liking Being Included In The list of GREAT Fans Who Are Picking Against The Cats In This One, Including But not Limited To- Josh Gershon, Ryan Stevens, Troy Mihalek, SoCalCal, SCCat, LosGatos05, NobodyBetter, NewportCat, ByJoveByJingle, Merkin, Chicat, Classof1990, Ben Hansen, WildcatPaulG, UofACat23, Zonacat, phenom5, VenturaCat, catgrad, TucsonDon, Barringer97, scumdevils06, etc.

Auercat

PS Please save the name calling for another place BWC. It will get edited out of this forum every time.

PPS Congrats on getting rep. I wouldn't brag about that "accomplishment". ;)

[gil=theonetruth]

BWC,


Bearing Down on Liking Being Included In The list of GREAT Fans Who Are Picking Against The Cats In This One, Including But not Limited To- Josh Gershon, Ryan Stevens, Troy Mihalek, SoCalCal, SCCat, LosGatos05, NobodyBetter, NewportCat, ByJoveByJingle, Merkin, Chicat, Classof1990, Ben Hansen, WildcatPaulG, UofACat23, Zonacat, phenom5, VenturaCat, catgrad, TucsonDon, Barringer97, scumdevils06, etc.



TD is a GREAT AZ fan??

[CaptCarnage]

This is intolerable. Let me sugarcoat this very delicately for those with tender sensibilities:

I see NO #@$%ing POINT WHATSOEVER in picking against our team. It is unseemly at best. If we lose, I would take no pride or satisfaction in predicting our loss. WHAT ARE YOU #@%#ing AFRAID OF???

I choose instead to phrase things just a tad more positively - to wit, "For Arizona to win the USC game, and by so doing to pull off one of the greatest upsets since David had good aim, the score of Saturday's game would have to resemble something similar to Arizona 33, USC 31 - in double overtime".

Consider the circumstances for such a score to occur! It is a much more pleasant exercise than taking the position of the masses (and the spread). Sure, USC is favored, and for very clear reasons. So what - an Arizona win *would* be an upset of epic proportion.

Ya know what, folks? We ain't lost yet, and I see absolutely no point in predicting a loss - especially on, of all places, the premiere UA fan site in the world. The LAST fooking thing I want to hear in the Coliseum is, "Yeah, even the diehard UA fans were picking against their team." - where I'm from, that is just pathetic.

To quote 'Eurotrip' in relative context, "For shaaaaaame..." I'll tell you what you win by picking against Arizona - a trip to Club VanderSexxx, that's what ... and no safe word for you.

BWC

Amen to that! No matter what the odds! GO CATS! I say history repeats, 13-10 Cats!

"Somebody's going to beat those guys" Herb Brooks , 1980 Olympics regarding the unbeaten Soviet Hockey team.

[Jason Scheer]

There is a difference between betting on it and being realistic. I am not about to go to Vegas and bet on AZ losing- ever. But if someone asks me about this game I am going to be truthful. It makes sense

[BigCat]

The score won't be indicative of the state of our program,but we currently still are a weak one--hoping for the future--Go Cats!:)

[BillsCarnage]

Kits - 10
SC - 72

[Chicat]

I am not about to go to Vegas and bet on AZ losing- ever.
I wouldn't bet on the Cats, period.

If I bet on them to win, the Chicat jinx will certainly cause them to lose, and if I bet on them to lose then not only am I an ass of a fan, but karma will bite me in the nutsack and Arizona will somehow eek out a victory, thus giving me a good feeling, but leaving me with a light wallet.

[scumdevils86]

go away billsc*cksucker

[NorCalCat]

http://actors.pick2web.com/pics/391930/mrt_rocky.jpg



PAIN!








Just kidding....we're gonna shake up the world Buster Douglas style today!