Pac-10 predisitions for next season

[mrb1823]

What do you think the final standings will look like?

[Zero]

what the hell is a predisition?

[mrb1823]

what the hell is a predisition?

Oops typo!

[BigO]

What sport?

[mrb1823]

What sport?

Doh? (Slap myself on the forehead) :) Basketball.

[11Banners]

Didn't you start this thread last week?

[Class of 1990]

Didn't you start this thread last week?

No that was the prediction thread.

[BigO]

(Slap myself on the forward) :) Basketball.

Strugglin today, huh?

[mrb1823]

Strugglin today, huh?

I give up!

[mrb1823]

Didn't you start this thread last week?

Actually I did not. Although given my posting errors today, I had to go back and check. :lol2:

[popque]

My predisitions:

1. UCRA
2. Wathu
3. UFC
4. Errisona
5. Origin
6. Samford
7. Washygn
8. C@;
9. Errisona Teck
10. Origin A&M

[mrb1823]

My predisitions:

1. UCRA
2. Wathu
3. UFC
4. Errisona
5. Origin
6. Samford
7. Washygn
8. C@;
9. Errisona Teck
10. Origin A&M

Touche! I deserved that one. :lol2:

[mrb1823]

Ok, here we go:

1) UCLA
2) Stanford
3) AZ
4) WSU
5) Oregon
6) USC (I don't think Pruitt will be back)
7) Washington (I don't think Hawes is coming back)
8) Arizona State
9) Cal
10) OSU

[BigO]

Ok, here we go:

1) UCLA
2) Stanford
3) AZ
4) WSU
5) Oregon
6) USC (I don't think Pruitt will be back)
7) Washington (I don't think Hawes is coming back)
8) Arizona State
9) Cal
10) OSU

That's about what I would think, with SC in front of Oregon.

[alum_in_sd]

Jim Basnight is reading this thread right now. I'd like to see his list.

[guert]

1) Arizona
2) UCLA
3) USC
4) Wazzu
5) Stanford
6) Oregon
7) Washington
8) Arizona State
9) Cal
10) OSU

Pac 10 gets at least 6 and maybe 7 teams in the NCAA Tournament.

[ghostwhitehorse]

Ok, here we go:

1) UCLA
2) Stanford
3) AZ
4) WSU
5) Oregon
6) USC (I don't think Pruitt will be back)
7) Washington (I don't think Hawes is coming back)
8) Arizona State
9) Cal
10) OSU

I would switch 'Cats and the Trees around (bias aside I think our guard situation is a tad better and great as dominate big's are . . . having the guys to get them the ball counts more) . . .other than that, good list.

That's about what I would think, with SC in front of Oregon.

SC is a great big, fat ?. They could be very good. . . or they could be a soap opera ("The continuing story of a program gone to the egos. . . " :lol: ).

[BeachCat97]

1) Arizona
2) UCLA
3) USC
4) Wazzu
5) Stanford
6) Oregon
7) Washington
8) Arizona State
9) Cal
10) OSU

Pac 10 gets at least 6 and maybe 7 teams in the NCAA Tournament.

Guert, with all due respect, you're on crack.

1. UCLA (and it ain't close)
2. WSU
3. Stanford
4. Arizona
5. USC
6. Oregon
7. Washington
8. ASU
9. Cal
10. OSU

[mrb1823]

1) Arizona
2) UCLA
3) USC
4) Wazzu
5) Stanford
6) Oregon
7) Washington
8) Arizona State
9) Cal
10) OSU

Pac 10 gets at least 6 and maybe 7 teams in the NCAA Tournament.

I agree that at least 6 teams make it into the dance again. As for AZ being #1, ummm... I think youth and the coaching changes will prevent that next year but I would not have expected anything less in terms of predictions from you Guert. :)

[mrb1823]

I would switch 'Cats and the Trees around (bias aside I think our guard situation is a tad better and great as dominate big's are . . . having the guys to get them the ball counts more) . . .other than that, good list.

I agree with your point in general but I don't think we will see Mitch as the starting PG for Stanford next year. I think Goods takes over at PG and that Fields will be the starting SG. Assuming the Lopez twins improve with a year under their belt, they will be hell for everyone including UCLA.

SC is a great big, fat ?. They could be very good. . . or they could be a soap opera ("The continuing story of a program gone to the egos. . . " :lol: ).

Agreed. Lose Pruitt and sc will have lost its top 3 scorers from last year. Mayo and Jefferson (assuming he's in) could become nightmares from a chemistry standpoint for Floyd.

[MacKiernan]

Guert, with all due respect, you're on crack.

That is not a revelation.

[ghostwhitehorse]

Guert, with all due respect, you're on crack.

From his posting style I say it's more of the green leafy stuff. . .you on the other hand. . .

1. UCLA (and it ain't close)
2. WSU
3. Stanford
4. Arizona
5. USC
6. Oregon
7. Washington
8. ASU
9. Cal
10. OSU

:rolleyes: Meth is a hell of drug. . .

[Lando05]

Guert, with all due respect, you're on crack.

1. UCLA (and it ain't close)
2. WSU
3. Stanford
4. Arizona
5. USC
6. Oregon
7. Washington
8. ASU
9. Cal
10. OSU

So your true colors come out! You are a UCLA fan!

[BeachCat97]

So your true colors come out! You are a UCLA fan!

It's unbelievable -- actually, now it's just getting comical -- how some members of this board, such as Lando, are incapbale of making a distinction between praising a program and rooting for a program.

As I've said numerous times in other threads, I like UCLA about as much as Calista Flockhart likes cheeseburgers. A Bruin loss, I'd argue, feels almost as good as an Arizona victory. Understand that I root just as ardently against UCLA as I root for Arizona. Got it?

That said, UCLA absolutely ownsArizona these days. It's unfortunate, and I eagerly look forward to the day when this trend reverses. But for now, the Bruins are kings of the Pac, and I expect their reign to continue in 2007-08. Saying so doesn't make me a fanof UCLA; it just means I like their chances of dominating our league for a third consecutive year.