Final Pac-10 rankings

[barringer97]

http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/huskyfootball/2008/01/final_pac10_rankings.html

from the Seattle Times guy...

7, Arizona --- Their early losses to BYU and New Mexico ended up not looking quite as bad.

My rankings would probably be the same except for Stanford;

1) USC
2) Oregon
3) ASU
4) OSU
5) Cal
6) Ucla
7) Cats
8) Stanford
9) Wazzu
10) UW

[AZ_BEAR_DOWN]

UNM went 9-4 a good season. BYU defeated UCLA twice.

Maybe that was not such a terrible loss afterall?

But hindsight we clearly should have beaten them at home. We will get them next year.

[Itamicbomb]

BYU defeated UCLA once, with UCLA playing without a coach and with a walk-on quarterback on a last-second blocked kick.

[biz cat]

We lost to BYU in our first game with the spread, against a team who runs it pretty well (their defense gets to practice against it). I'll give our guys a pass on that one.

But the New Mexico game, no matter what their record was, should have been a W. Same goes for Stanford. Those are two losses that absolutely should not have happened, and no excuses should ever be made for them.

[BibbysTowelDude]

The loss to BYU is the same. That team isn't that talented.

[ASUHATER!]

The loss to BYU is the same. That team isn't that talented.

which is exactly why they won their conference and won 11 games :confused:

[Drayhound]

The BYU game I can understand losing, but the New Mexico game is inexcusable. We should have never lost to that team at home.